刘菊花抄袭剽窃专辑(亦明)- 中国学术评价网
 
关于《刘菊花硕士论文涉嫌抄袭事件公开信》的第七号公告 (3109 查看)
发布: 亦明
日期: December 14, 2012 05:15PM

中国社会科学院研究生院应“切实解决群众反映强烈的问题”──

关于《海内外240位学人就刘菊花硕士论文涉嫌抄袭事件公开信》公告第七号



中国社会科学院研究生院硕士学位获得者刘菊花的硕士论文,经查对,涉嫌严重抄袭。这原本是个再简单不过的学术不端问题。

对于刘菊花硕士论文涉嫌抄袭问题,从行政和法律上看,中国社会科学院研究生院有义不容辞的行政管辖权和法律处置权。但令人遗憾的是,对于2012年3月15日《海内外240位学人就刘菊花硕士论文涉嫌抄袭事件公开信》一事,在过去长达九个月的时间内,中国社会科学院研究生院好像根本没有发生过一样,熟视无睹,漠不关心,至今未能给予公众以调查和处置结果。

2012年12月4日,习近平总书记主持召开中共中央政治局会议,审议通过中共中央“改进工作作风八项规定”。会议强调:各级党政机关和领导干部要带头密切联系群众,带头解决实际问题;各地区各部门要严格按照本规定,结合实际情况,狠抓落实,切实抓出成效,切实解决群众反映强烈的问题。

我们认为,中国社会科学院研究生院理应贯彻、落实中共中央政治局关于“改进工作作风八项规定”及其精神;像中国科学院大学(中国科学院研究生院)在该校六年前的毕业生赵敏博士论文严重抄袭被曝光不到三周即将其博士学位褫夺、将毕业证书吊销那样,依法公开查处刘菊花的硕士论文涉嫌严重抄袭问题,并且追究相关人员、单位的责任。否则的话,我们不禁要问:难道你们不受党纪国法的约束?

特此公告。

2012年12月15日

学术批评网([www.acriticism.com])
中国学术评价网([www.2250s.com])
学术诚信网([www.academeintegrity.com])

The 7th Announcement Regarding the Open Letter on Liu Juhua’s Plagiarism Case


December 15, 2012


The alleged plagiarism committed by Ms. Liu Juhua is a simple academic misconduct case, and from administrative and legal point of views, the Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (GSCASS) has unshirkable obligation and responsibility to deal with it. Unfortunately, since the publication of our Open Letter, nine months have passed, and GSCASS is still pretending nothing has happened, is still refusing to respond to us and Chinese society.

On December 4, 2012, the Political Bureau of the Communist Party of China Central Committee (CPCCC) held a meeting, presided over by Xi Jinping, general secretary of the CPCCC. According to the statement released after the meeting, all members of the Political Bureau are urged to understand the real situation facing society through in-depth inspections at grassroots, listen more to the public and officials at grassroots levels, and solve people's practical problems. The meeting demands Party organizations and officials at all levels to implement the “eight requirements.” (Xinhua News Agency. New CPC leadership rejects extravagance, bureaucracy.)

We believe that GSCASS not only should implement the eight requirements specified by the new leadership of CPC, it also should follow the example of the Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences (now University of Chinese Academy of Sciences), which deprived the doctorate degree and revoked the diploma of one of its alumni in less than three weeks after his plagiarism was disclosed, to prosecute Liu Juhua’s case, and hold the relevant personals accountable for their responsibility. Otherwise, we have to ask: Do you think you are beyond the law of the land?

Hereby announced.

Academic Criticism, [www.acriticism.com]
Academic Integrity, [www.academeintegrity.com]
China Academic Integrity Review, [www.2250s.com]        



被编辑2次。最后被亦明编辑于02/14/2014 03:43PM。

选项: 回复引用


主题 发布者 已发表
关于《刘菊花硕士论文涉嫌抄袭事件公开信》的第七号公告 (3109 查看) 亦明 12/14/2012 05:15PM


该主题已经关闭。
2250s.com does not represent or guarantee the truthfulness, accuracy, or reliability of any of communications posted by users.

This forum powered by Phorum.