刘菊花抄袭剽窃专辑(亦明)- 中国学术评价网
 
关于《刘菊花硕士论文涉嫌抄袭事件公开信》的第十六号公告 (2145 查看)
发布: 亦明
日期: September 14, 2013 05:52PM

蠹学、肾思、懵骗、上幸────

关于《海内外240位学人就刘菊花硕士论文涉嫌抄袭事件公开信》公告第十六号



据称,中国社会科学院研究生院的校训是“笃学、慎思、明辨、尚行”,该校训“不仅是研究生院未来建设和长期发展的重要航标”,而且是“更好地为中华民族的伟大复兴和中国现代化伟大事业做出新的更大贡献的重要指导。”但事实是,经过刘菊花抄袭案的折射,我们可以非常清楚地看出,这个校训不过就是秦楼楚馆门前的牌坊和幌子。

首先,国家的政策和法律对如何处理学位欺诈,有十分明确的规定。可是,这个自诩的“马克思主义的坚强阵地、我国哲学社会科学研究的最高殿堂、党中央国务院的思想库和智囊团后备人才培养基地”却视国法如无物,拒不学习。这哪里是什么“笃学”,而是地地道道的蠹学!

其次,对于抄袭剽窃,学界人士和机构──不论古今中外──均视若仇雠,必欲除之而后快。可是,刘菊花抄袭案从曝光到现在,已经整整两年半了;240人联名公开举报此案,至今也已经十八个月、五百多天了。而“马克思主义的坚强阵地”目前仍旧对之拒不表态。就算是一个浑蛋用肾脏来“慎思”,这么长的时间,他也该把这个问题“思”明白了吧?

第三,刘菊花抄袭案铁证如山,是非曲直判若白昼黑夜,套用“假打斗士”方舟子的话来说就是,“刘菊花抄没抄,小学生都知道。”那么,为什么如此简单的问题,到了“我国哲学社会科学研究的最高殿堂”,却“明辨”不了了呢?显然,他们根本就不要什么“明辨”,而是要明目张胆地“懵骗”!

第四,事实是,在刘菊花抄袭案这个问题上,根本就不存在什么“学”、“思”、“辨”的问题,而只存在“行”与“不行”的问题。那么,为什么号称“尚行”的“党中央国务院的思想库和智囊团”却坚决“不行”呢?显然,是他们的某个主子不让他们“行”,所以他们也就不敢“行”,只能通过装聋作哑的方式来应付,希冀以此得到上面的宠幸。

有道是,“汉贼不两立”。当婊子可以,但在当婊子的同时树立道德牌坊却坚决不行!因为道德牌坊属于整个社会的共同财富,绝不容许极少数人因为肮脏的私利将其玷污!请中国社会科学院研究生院在当婊子与立牌坊之间做出选择!

特此公告!

2013年9月15日
学术批评网(www.acriticism.com)
学术诚信网(www.academeintegrity.com)
中国学术评价网(www.2250s.com)





The 16th Announcement Regarding the Open Letter on Liu Juhua’s Plagiarism Case


September 15, 2013


The motto of the Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (GSCASS) is: study diligently, think prudently, discern distinctly, and act courageously. It is said that the motto “not only is the important navigation mark for the future construction and long-term development of the Graduate School,” it is also “the important guidance for making new and greater contribution to the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation and the great cause of China's modernization.” However, based on what the GSCASS has done, or more exactly, what the School hasn’t done, about the Liu Juhua scandal, it is crystal clear that the motto is nothing but a camouflage used for hiding their dirty deeds.

First of all, China’s laws and government regulations state explicitly how to handle academic degree fraud. However, it seems that the GSCASS, the self-proclaimed “the training base of the reserve talents for the stronghold of Marxism, the highest academic hall of philosophy and social sciences in China, and the think tank of the CCP Central Committee and the State Council of China,” has been intentionally ignoring these laws and regulations. Obviously, they do not study at all, let alone diligently.

Secondly, the academic communities around the world regard plagiarism as their worst enemy. However, two and a half years have passed since the outbreak of Liu Juhua plagiarism scandal, and eighteen months have passed since our open letter was made public and sent to them directly, yet we are still waiting for “the stronghold of Marxism” to make an official comment or statement on the notorious case. It seems that even a fool should be able to think the matter over thoroughly during such a long time. It is obvious that the GSCASS has not been thinking prudently, they don’t think at all.

Thirdly, there are mountains of irrefutable evidence showing that Liu Juhua indeed committed plagiarism, so it is extremely easy for the GSCASS to show the world their discernment on the case. And yet, “the highest academic hall of philosophy and social sciences in China” is still unable to do so. The only explanation to this is that the GSCASS does not want to discern, let alone discern distinctly.

Lastly, it appears that everyone understands that the key issue on the Liu Juhua scandal is to take action according to the laws of the land and academic norms adopted by the civilized world. However, “the think tank of the CCP Central Committee and the State Council of China” has been refusing to take any actions. Why? Obviously because they are disallowed by their boss to act, therefore, they could not act, let alone act courageously.

We believe that it might be a private matter if one chooses to prostitute; however, it is a public matter if one prostitutes while moaning moralism, because by doing so, he/she sullies, disgraces, and degrades our moral standard, which, of course, is the heritage of human civilization. Therefore, we strongly urge the GSCASS to make a choice between upholding a moral banner and selling your own body and soul.

Hereby announced by:

Academic Criticism, [www.acriticism.com]
Academic Integrity, [www.academeintegrity.com]
China Academic Integrity Review, [www.2250s.com]


    

选项: 回复引用


主题 发布者 已发表
关于《刘菊花硕士论文涉嫌抄袭事件公开信》的第十六号公告 (2145 查看) 亦明 09/14/2013 05:52PM


对不起,只有注册用户才能发帖。
2250s.com does not represent or guarantee the truthfulness, accuracy, or reliability of any of communications posted by users.

This forum powered by Phorum.